Sunday, August 4, 2013

Better Bridge in Barry County August 1 2013


Better Bridge in Barry County


By Gerald Stein

 

 

 
North
  10 8    
  A Q 9 6 5 
  5 4   
  K J 7 3
 
West
  A 9 7 6 4 2
  J 4 3  
  3 2   
  6 5
 
East
  J 3
  7
  K 10 9 8 7
  A Q 10 9 2
 
South
  K Q 5
  K 10 8 2
  A Q J 6  
  8 4
 

 

 

Dealer:
Vulnerable:
Lead:
South
Both
6♣

 

North
 
2♣
4
East
 
Dbl
Pass
South
1NT
2
Pass
West
Pass
Pass
Pass
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

In a local duplicate pairs game, today’s hand was played nine times. Eight of the nine pairs ended up in the sensible and proper major suit game with 4. Four of those eight who played in the game suit in hearts, however, failed to make the contract while the other four made the contact easily. What was the difference between those who failed and those who made the contract? Let’s take a look.

In all of the hands played that reached 4, South opened 1NT with the right number of high-card points with 15. North responded with 2♣, using the Stayman Convention to inform partner that she had at least eight points and a four-card major. East threw in a double following the 2♣ bid. While this could have been construed as a take-out bid, most players knew that with 15 points in the South hand and at least eight points in the North hand, that a take-out double was not realistic. No, there was another message with the double: it is called a Lead-directing Double informing West, if she got the lead to lead a club for an opening lead as East had a strong holding in clubs.

South ignored the double, but perhaps she should have paid more attention to it. South bid her four-card heart suit, and North raised to 4. This happened in eight out of the nine hands played for this round. West, with the lead, led the higher of her two clubs, the 6♣. Had South been paying closer attention, she would have picked up on the lead and played the hand differently. Instead, South saw the strong hearts, the club suit from North, and not much more. Four hearts looked to make easily, thought South. How wrong she was!

Picking either the K♣ or the J♣ made no difference on the first trick. East would take the first trick with the A♣ if the K♣ was played, or the Q♣ if the J♣ was played. The lead-directing double had done its work properly, and East played and won the first two club tricks. West played the 5♣ on the second trick, and an observant South should have picked up on the high-low discard, suggesting that West had only two clubs. Playing the higher card first and then the lower card the next time is a standard way of giving a count signal. Poor South missed the signal and when East played a third round of clubs, South trumped low. West overtrumped, and immediately West played the A♠ taking the first four tricks. The North/South 4 contract was quickly set one trick for a minus 100 for North/South instead of the plus 620 they should have earned.

What should South have done to preserve the victory for her team? South should have won the third trick high with the K! That will safeguard a West opponent overtrumping and setting the contract. True, it will still not be easy to make the rest of the tricks with the J in the West hand, but a lead of the 10from South should result in gathering in all of the trumps without endangering the contract. Not taking care of business that was there for the taking resulted in four teams receiving poor scores for not making a makeable game. The other four teams who listened to the bidding, knowing that the double was a Lead-directing Double and knowing that to make that kind of bid, East would need at least five good clubs in her hand, made the contract and a plus score. Additionally, watching the lead and the second card played from West should also have been a tipoff that West had only two clubs as well.

Hindsight is always a wonderful thing to talk about, especially in a post mortem discussion in bridge. Today’s hand was interesting because four pairs were able to read the signs and take advantage of them while the other four pairs failed to see or understand the signs right there in front of them. In the future, watch the bidding more closely. Watch the leads and the subsequent play of cards to see if you can read the defense’s mind. Doing that will help you end up on the plus side of the score sheet instead of on the minus side.

 

Gerald Stein

July 27, 2013

Number of words: 832

No comments:

Post a Comment