Better Bridge in Barry County
By
Gerald Stein
|
North
♠ A K 6
♥ K Q J 4 2
♦ A K 5 4
♣ Q
|
|
West
♠ J 5
♥ 10 8
♦ 9 3 2
♣ K J 8 7 6 4
|
|
East
♠ 9 4 3
♥ 9 7 6 3
♦ Q J 8 7 6
♣ 5
|
|
South
♠ Q 10 8 7 2
♥ A 5
♦ 10
♣ A 10 9 3 2
|
|
Dealer:
Vulnerable:
Lead:
|
North
Neither
2♦
|
North
2♣
2♥
3♦
4♠
Pass
|
East
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
|
South
2♦
2♠
4♣
7♠
|
West
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Today’s hand is a bridge player’s dream hand. With a
powerhouse in the North hand, and two long suits in the South hand along with
key aces, what is there not to like about playing at the seven level in a Grand
Slam contract? The fact is that there are three places to play this hand. Can
you spot the other two possible contracts?
North with 22 high card points opened the bidding
with the artificial 2♣ bid promising a big hand and forcing South to bid until
either game or slam had been reached. South responded with the 2♦ bid, a waiting bid, asking partner to show her main
suit. North showed the solid five-card heart suit, and South responded with a
positive 2♠ bid, promising five spades and at least eight high card points.
This bid was also a forcing bid, requiring North to bid game in no trump if
that sounded attractive.
North had bigger plans in store for the partnership,
and she next bid 4♦, promising a four-card
diamond suit as well as the five-card heart suit. South had a good count of
North’s hand at that point, knowing nine of the thirteen cards. South then bid
4♣, letting North know that she had five spades and at least four clubs. Now
North had a good count of South’s hand, knowing nine of her thirteen cards: five
spades and at least four clubs.
When North bid 4♠, letting South know that she had
three spades, South had a complete count of her partner’s hand: five hearts,
four diamonds, three spades, and therefore, by default, only one club. With the
A♣ poised for help, South placed the contract at 7♠, and all passed.
With the lead of the 2♦,
it was just a matter of winning the first trick with the A♦, and then drawing three rounds of trumps. Playing
the A♥ from the short side, and then all of the
hearts, with the last two hearts promoted as winners, it was an easy matter of
claiming all thirteen tricks and a fine score of 1510.
While 1510 is a fine score, and earned 10 declarers
an 81% game, two declarers managed to achieve a 98% score. Do you know how they
did it? Of course, they bid 7NT instead of 7♠, and the extra 10 points
propelled them into the top bracket for this hand with a 1520 score. What was
the other contract that was possible on this hand? If you said, “Seven hearts,”
you would be absolutely correct. However, only one declarer managed to find the
7♥ contract.
All in all, 13 declarers were in the right contract
with a 7NT, a 7♠, or a 7♥ final bid. What about
the 27 others who played this same hand? Most made it to 6NT or 6S, and then
bailed out, evidently feeling that a bid of seven was beyond the scope of their
ability. One unlucky declarer bid the 7♠ contract but so bungled the play of
the hand that he went down three tricks. So much for our golden opportunities.
What are the takeaways from a dream hand like this
one? Because a hand that can make seven is a rarity, when it does come up, give
it a shot! You certainly will not do as poorly as the bridge player who went
down three on a cold hand. You will remember those hands where you bid and made
the seven hearts or the seven spades or the seven no trump. Go for the sevens,
and roll yourself a winner.
Bridge Notes: Do you want to feel comfortable
bidding and making a Grand Slam Contract? Do you think you could use some help
on your play of the hand when you are the declarer? Do you want to learn how to
count the number of cards in your partner’s hand to help you arrive at the best
contract? If yes is your answer, look for the “Play of the Hand in the 21st
Century” bridge class slated to start on Tuesday, September 9, 2014 at the
Kellogg Community College Technology campus on Hill Brady Road in Battle Creek.
Gerald Stein
July 25, 2014
Number of words: 811
No comments:
Post a Comment