Better Bridge in Barry County
By
Gerald Stein
|
North
♠ 9 8 3 2
♥ A J 6
♦ A Q 10 9
♣ 5 2
|
|
West
♠ A Q 7 6
♥ Q 8 7
♦ 8 6 4 2
♣ 8 3
|
|
East
♠ K J 10 5 4
♥ 10 3 2
♦ K 7 5
♣ K 4
|
|
South
♠ ---
♥ K 9 5 4
♦ J 3
♣ A Q J 10 9 7 6
|
|
Dealer:
Vulnerable:
Lead:
|
East
Both
A♠
|
North
1♦
?
|
East
Pass
1♠
|
South
1♣
3♣
|
West
Pass
Pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duplicate Bridge Scoring Part Two
In a recent duplicate bridge tournament held in
Lansing, this hand came up and was played numerous times with varying degrees
of success. In duplicate bridge, the object is always to make the best score
with the cards that you have been dealt. Your opponents have also received the
same cards as others so the element of luck is removed, and the true test is
how well you can do with the cards that you hold in your hand.
In this particular hand, East as the dealer had ten high card points; South had eleven; West had
eight, and North had eleven. This was not a hand to get too excited about as
everyone soon realized that the points had been distributed fairly evenly among
the four hands. It was up to North/South with the preponderance of points to
make something happen.
After East the dealer passed, South had a tough
decision. Should she with eleven high card points and a void in spades open the
bidding with 3♣’s? Some did exactly that, and the hand was passed out, and the
contract was 3♣’s in the South. Today’s South, however, was a bit
tournament-savvy, and so she opened 1♣ planning to jump her next bid. After
West passed with his eight points, North bid 1♦
bidding up the line and promising at least four diamonds and at least six
points. Perhaps, North should have bid differently, but who knows what to do in
a tournament some times?
East wanted to let his partner know about his decent
spades, so he overcalled 1♠. This gave his partner some kind of idea for a lead,
and the bid was justified with five spades and ten points at the one level.
South now jumped to 3♣’s as she had planned showing seven clubs and extra
points, mainly with the new information about the spades being in the opponents’
hands. West wanted to bid but with the vulnerability status, 3♠ was too high.
West passed.
Now it was up to North. He had promised at least six
high card points, but now he knew more about his partner’s hand and that she
had a lot of clubs. While he does not have much help in clubs, he does have two
aces, one in hearts and one in diamonds. What should North have bid at this
point? Should North pass and play the hand at 3♣’s? Should North name another
suit? What would it be? Should North bid 3NT without a stopper in spades?
Should North have bid 4NT asking for aces and a slam try?
In reality, North failed his partner by passing the
jumped bid. The bid, of course, is the 4NT bid asking for aces. South would
have responded 5♦ that she had one ace, and
North would have placed the contract at 6♣. Does the contract make at 6♣’s? Of
course it does, and North/South would have claimed the highest score on that
hand by making a small slam and gathering in a first place finish by scoring
120 for the game score, 500 for the vulnerable game bonus, and 750 for the
small slam in a minor suit for a score of 1370.
How did those who passed the jump bid do in
comparison? Three teams did exactly that and scored five tricks for a score of
100 plus the part score of 50 for 150. Of course, it is easy to see that they
failed to come even close to those who ventured on to the small slam. For their
efforts, they were awarded the lowest score on this hand. They did very poorly.
For those who bid game and scored 620 or even 660,
they were rewarded for their making more points than those who stopped short of
game. They were near the top of the scores on this hand.
Some pairs worked hard to get an extra trick making
six clubs even though they had not bid the game nor the slam. For making six
without bidding game, they scored 170, a twenty-point gain which is better than
those who made five and a 150 score. They scored in the middle of the group
instead of the bottom level.
What are the takeaways about scoring in Duplicate
Bridge? Bid the right contract and make it! This will give you the best chance
on this particular hand. Of course, you need to do that consistently, as you
will play 24 or 25 hands of bridge, and you hope to score at least 50% or
better on the 24 or 25 hands. Secondly, even if you fail to bid the right
contract, try to take as many tricks as you can to make up for failing to bid
the right contract. Sometimes, an extra trick or two will propel you into a
better score than just taking the apparent tricks. Of course, you must also
realize that you will defend half of the time as well as declare. So you have
twelve boards to make things happen for your team.
Try playing Duplicate Bridge as a chance to see how
you can be competitive in the bridge world. You will soon find that you are
looking for the best contracts and the best ways to take all the tricks that
you can. You will find that you will become a better bridge player and not just
a lucky bridge player. Best wishes.
Gerald Stein
July 25, 2015
Number of words: 1016